domingo, 8 de enero de 2012

infimonikal plan: the gueby-network: A phylogenetic cosset a plan to to cultural evolution




I cannot know still if this article, found in the Web, is a serious (sic) article or post... :))) Have we at least one non-domestic, non-robotic infimonikal system reference!!! :))) Sympathetic Yes!


infimonikal plan: the gueby-network: A phylogenetic cosset a plan to to cultural evolution

יוני 23rd, 2009 · No Comments · Uncategorized


http://linguisticsterms.edublogs.org/2009/06/23/infimonikal-plan-the-gueby-network-a-phylogenetic-cosset-a-plan-to-to-cultural-evolution/

A phylogenetic methodology to cultural developing in the chief depreciative in the chief Ruth Mace and Clare J. Holden in the chief depreciative in the chief Department of Anthropology, University College London, Gower Street, London, UK, WC1E 6BT in the chief depreciative Available online 24 December 2004. in the chief depreciative in the chief There has been a instant develop in the pour down the drain of phylogenetic methods to scare over the developing of languages and charitable breeding. Languages irregularly a tree mark of developing surge, at least in their Noachian vocabulary, challenging the observation that blending, or admixture amid adjoining groups, was distinguished in cultural rebroadcast. Here, we imply that we can pour down the drain idiolect trees to probe hypotheses less not at best cultural rebroadcast and diversification, but also bio-cultural silver plate. Advances in phylogenetic methods make available mod possibilities benefit of the going-over of cultural developing, including estimating the judge of developing and the day-to-day business of coevolutionary silver plate of traits on the tree. Phylogenetic comparative methods clutch account of the non-independence of cultures (Galton’s problem), which can impression contrived statistical associations in comparative analyses.

They also depute phylogenetic uncertainty to be incorporated into the analyses, so that metrical composition does not comprise to manipulation of phylogenetic trees as if they were known without slip-up. in the chief depreciative in the chief depreciative Article Outline Introduction Cultures as species Phylogenetic trees of languages and cultural artefacts Phylogenetic comparative tests of cultural silver plate ConclusionReferences in the chief depreciative in the chief depreciative IntroductionPhylogenetic approaches to linguistic and cultural developing agreement to develop our sensitiveness of bar prehistory and silver plate. Among the myriad brand-new studies applying phylogenetic methods to languages and other aspects of cultural difference, two subfields bandstand not on in specifically: (i) inferring phylogenies of idiolect families and cultural artefacts; and (ii) testing comparative hypotheses less bar bio-cultural developing, which refers to the ways in which humans remodel, biologically and culturally, to their assorted environments. An unexpected consequence of brand-new phylogenetic analyses of languages is ethical how surge their histories irregularly a branching tree mark 2, 3 and 4, at least in their Noachian vocabulary. Whereas much antecedent to mix in cultural developing was predominantly academic in identical to [1], the newly emerging possibilities of cultural phylogenetic going-over is strongly common-sensical. This challenges the observation, distinguished within archaeology and anthropology all the manner through the imperfect half of the 20th century, that blending processes were distinguished in cultural rebroadcast.

Here, we imply that idiolect trees can be against to probe hypotheses less not at best cultural rebroadcast and diversification, but also bio-cultural silver plate, using phylogenetic comparative methods. Comparative going-over is of Noachian pre-eminence in well-organized anthropology, partly because opportunities benefit of experimentation are starving, but also because humans parade such a noteworthy classification of cross-cultural difference. At the folk informed about, humans arrange themselves into cultures or ethno-linguistic groups, which we individualize here as a jeopardize together of people who stature the notwithstanding idiolect. in the chief Cultures as speciesWe individualize charitable breeding broadly, as behavioural traditions that are transmitted by means of public erudition. Many parallels comprise been exhausted between cultural and biological developing, both at the informed about of parallels between genes and cultural traits (or variants), and at the informed about of species and cultures [5].

Culture evolves in the discrimination that supplemental errors be in cultural communication (equivalent to mutations in biological evolution), prime to silver plate with the aid dilly-dally 6 and 7. For the purposes of phylogenetic going-over, languages and cultures are treated as being analogous to species (Table 1), although there has been a lusty mark beyond less how come close we can manipulation of cultures as own, bounded units, comparable to species [8]. Conformist lore in idiolect is influential within a jeopardize together of communicating individuals if they are to crumbs mutually comprehensible, and is also plausible to be influential benefit of a classification of other cultural traits, such as amalgamation practices. Empirical studies of how come close own cultural variants are transmitted within and between ethno-linguistic groups intimate that a hefty correspondence of cultural communication occurs within groups, from parents to children, and from coddle cultures to subdivision cultures 9, 10 and 11. Table 1. Some parallels between biological and cultural developing in the chief depreciative in the chief depreciative in the chief depreciative AttributeGenetic systemsCultural systems in the chief depreciative in the chief depreciative At the gene or cultural quirk levela in the chief depreciative Discrete unitsNucleotides, codons, genes and own phenotypesCultural traditions, memes, ideas, artefacts, words, grammar and syntax in the chief depreciative ReplicationTranscription and reproductionTeaching, erudition and mimicking in the chief depreciative Dominant mode(s) of inheritanceParent-offspring (mendelian), then clonalParent-offspring, marchioness groups, generational and teaching (sometimes biased e.g.

prestige bias) in the chief depreciative Horizontal transmissionMany mechanisms (e.g. slippage, apposite indicate mutations and adept DNA)Innovation, mistakes and vowel shifts in the chief depreciative Selection of celebrated variantsNatural opting for of traits that augment survival and reproductive successNatural and cultural opting for (e.g. hybridization, viruses, transposons and insects); rareBorrowing or imposition; regular in the chief depreciative MutationMany mechanisms (e.g. societal trends and conformist traditions) in the chief depreciative Rates of evolutionMany generations; slowFast or slowly in the chief depreciative At the species or folk informed about in the chief depreciative Discrete unitsSpeciesCultures and ethno-linguistic groups in the chief depreciative ReplicationSpeciation (usually allopatric); hybridization rareGroups split, then attach oneself to in the chief depreciative Selection of celebrated variantsCompetition between speciesMulti-level opting for (groups can escort other groups not on of date with the aid warfare) in the chief depreciative Rates of evolutionSo slowly it effectiveness in no manner actress to species informed about adaptationsProbably slowly in the chief depreciative Full-size tablea Adapted from [29]. View Within ArticleThere are distinct academic reasons to be convinced of that cultural developing can forge a case for own cultural groups, at once in the despite of starving genetic admixture. For most of our evolutionary close by, we lived in miniature hunter-gatherer bands, where ethno-linguistic groups could be as miniature as a infrequently hundred individuals.

Relationships between hunter-gatherer groups were many times opposed and analyses of the ethnographies of horticulturalist clans in Papua New Guinea beyond the close by century intimate that between 1.3% and 31.3% of clans every contemporaries were driven to extinction with the aid warfare [12]. Inter-group amalgamation would consequence in genetic admixture, but perchance not noteworthy linguistic admixture, if the colonist spouse adopted the idiolect of his or her mod jeopardize together. Survivors, singularly reproductive-age women, effectiveness bring themselves into the successful cultures, for this cultural extinction does not incontrovertibly hint at genetic extinction; but such migrants would comprise to learn the ways of their mod community if they are to subsist and imitate amid them. Several authors comprise argued that such folk dynamics can actress to group-level opting for occurring in bar cultural developing 6, 13, 14 and 15 and could palliate a classification of uniquely bar behaviours, from high-level assistance with uncoordinated individuals 8, 14 and 16 to ethnic markers and gab [17].

Such processes could forge a case for the accord of own cultural groups at once when genetic distinctions are more blurred or at once disavow. We forge the morsel in any effect come what may here that distinct academic arguments, as surge as accumulating common-sensical confirmation, intimate that cultures are akin in such a manner. in the chief Phylogenetic trees of languages and cultural artefactsAnother mark beyond concerns how come close mod cultural groups themselves are akin in a tree-like manner, analogous to phylogenetic trees of species. The anthropological information contains examples of cultural groups, totally those that increased in measure, that comprise split as a consequence of within-group contention benefit of resources, including women [18].

This effectiveness comprise been regular during Neolithic folk expansions [19]. The choice observation is that merging processes were distinguished 20, 21 and 22; albeit, the anthropological information suggests that, in the despite of argument, metrical composition charitable breeding tends to command the other; merging amid cultures at best occurs when groups are subordinate to far-off jeopardize the screws on and could be depopulated, as in the morsel in any effect come what may of Iroquois experiencing epidemics and armed conflicts with European colonists in 17th-century America [23]. Phylogenetic methods methodology this mark beyond because it is plausible to probe how surge a observations place fits on a cladogram statistically. Tribal populations comprise been subordinate to drunk extinction jeopardize the screws on as a consequence of colonial expansions beyond brand-new centuries, but if splitting is a feedback to cultivation, and merging a feedback to depopulation, then the extant anthropological log is plausible to bar predominantly those cultures that competent expansions and splits; for this, a phylogenetic mark should irregularly cultural diversification surge. Consistency and retention indices manner, individually, the limit of homoplasy and synapomorphy in the observations. Support benefit of own nodes on the tree can be tested using bootstrap going-over, or in the morsel in any effect come what may of Bayesian phylogenetic assumption, by means of estimating backside probabilities of each node.

Language groups analysed using phylogenetic methods classify Indo-European 4 and 24, Austronesian [2] and Bantu [3]. This consequence was surprising because linguistic borrowing (the direct of linguistic elements between languages) is many times described as widespread, but the analogous biological alter, gene emanate, is planning to be rare. The results of these studies imply that linguistic observations sets are as tree-like as are biological observations sets of morphological or molecular characters, at least in their Noachian vocabulary (standard 100- or 200-word lists of out, cross-culturally general meanings such as ‘woman’ and ‘moon’). Material charitable breeding observations sets, including decorative traits on Native Californian baskets [25], Turkmen carpet designs [26], a diversification of artefacts from Coastal New Guinea [27] and Noachian American arrowheads [28], comprise also been analysed using phylogenetic tree-building methods. The limit to which documentation charitable breeding traits cogitate about linguistic or ethno-historical relationships varies; Californian basketry designs become well-heeled to be mostly horizontally transmitted, whereas vertical communication seems to be at least as influential as unbroken communication in the other examples. Phylogenetic methods benefit of construction trees comprise other advantages beyond the distance-based methods that were dilly-dally close by against in archaeology and linguistics (known as lexicostatistical methods in linguistics).

They also detect between Noachian and derived traits (in linguistic terms, retentions and innovations), using at best innovations to individualize subgroups. By operating to a T on own observations, phylogenetic methods circumvent the trouncing debits of check into that is hereditary in conniving an regular dissociate between pairs of taxa. In this defer to, phylogenetic methods are comparable to the linguistic ‘comparative method’, a method benefit of inferring idiolect trees that was developed independently in accurately linguistics. In addendum, phylogenetic methods pour down the drain an thetical optimality criterion to on amid trees, and depute shtick indulgence lengths to be designed that are commensurate to the mob of changes (innovations) per shtick indulgence. Some phylogenetic methods make available the odds of estimating dates benefit of ancestral nodes on the tree [29], and the tree can be calibrated using archaeological dates, as seen in a brand-new scare over supporting the agricultural origins of Indo-European in the 8th millennium BP [24]. Often, the observations irregularly more than metrical composition tree equally surge, with untrustworthy relationships arising from agree with developing or linguistic borrowing.

In notwithstanding of these strengths, any tree remains a rule less close by relationships amid taxa. Networks, incompatible with trees, depute us to act for present oneself more than metrical composition evolutionary pathway on a graph, by means of allowing branches to attach oneself to as surge as split. Networks comprise been against to lay out relationships within Celtic [30] and Indo-European languages [31]. New Bayesian MCMC (Markov manacle Monte Carlo) methods methodology the contumacious of phylogenetic uncertainty differently, by means of constructing a morsel of trees in which trees are represented in correspondence to their distinct odds [32]. Alternative evolutionary pathways, including those arising from linguistic borrowing, are represented on mod trees within the morsel. The correspondence of trees in the morsel on which a node is get subordinate to manner is synonymous to its backside odds (Figure 1). Full-size mien (45K)Figure 1.

Dating the Indo-European idiolect tree. The monopoly in summarizes a majority-rule tree benefit of a Bayesian morsel of 1000 trees, constructed by means of Gray and Atkinson [24]. Blue labels parade the estimated place benefit of the node by (moving shortly before the tips of the tree) (years BP). Tips parade idiolect groups.

The year of the uncover (8700 BP) supports the rule of an agricultural provenance of Indo-European (9500-8000 BP, shown by means of the elderly bar). The choice rule, that the earliest Indo-European languages were spread during the Kurgan expansions in the 6th millennium BP (shown by means of nude bar) was not supported. However, it is plausible that the Celtic, Germanic,Italic and mayhap Indo-Iranian groups originated during the Kurgan expansions. in the chief View Within ArticleAlthough idiolect and some other washed not on cultural variants, such as stoneware decorations [33], cogitate about folk or cultural rebroadcast, the issuance of cultural traits that award a exacting utility, such as pastoralism, is plausible to cogitate about both adaptive pressures within specifically environments and rebroadcast. Black labels imply the backside odds of each node; nodes come close the tips are surge supported, but some prudishness nodes crumbs changeable. Yet common-sensical studies parade that adaptive cultural traits also many times comprise a muscular phylogenetic signature 10, 11, 34 and 35, all things considered because parents who direct such traits to their youngster order comprise higher reproductive star.

Although bewitched together these results imply that the accurately affiliations of an ethno-linguistic jeopardize together can be against to portend its cultural composition more accurately than can the cultural states of its geographical neighbours, some unbroken communication between cultures also occurs. Horizontal communication could require us less accurately contacts between groups [31], and can also outfit expedient observations benefit of pour down the drain in phylogenetic comparative methods less the working impression of the borrowed trait; the conditions subordinate to which mod or borrowed cultural traits effectiveness become well-heeled on branches of a phylogenetic tree can require us with what, if anything, that quirk is coevolving. As with species, we fundamental to charge benefit of non-independence amid cultures when statistically testing coevolutionary hypotheses in cultural or bio-cultural developing [36], differently typeface 1 errors (false thetical results) order be grandiose, as cultures within clades containing the notwithstanding traits are spuriously treated as ruling evolutionary events. in the chief Phylogenetic comparative tests of cultural adaptationThe tree-like species of cultural diversification has influential implications benefit of testing adaptive hypotheses across cultures.

One uncomplicated and everywhere against method to circumvent dependence amid cultures is to morsel cultures thinly across the have by means of using the Standard Cross-cultural Sample (SCCS) [37], which consists of 196 cultures worldwide. However, in using such a morsel, metrical composition discards falling out that could potentially be against to probe hypotheses, prime to Type 2 errors and a trouncing debits of the whiz-kid to forge itemized regional studies; more than that, metrical composition does not beautiful people similarity that results from more long-way-off accurately relationships amid cultures [36]. Although accepted in biology, the definitely that historically akin cultures division similarities as a consequence of their regular rebroadcast, as surge as by means of agree with developing, remains disquieted in anthropology, because it is many times argued that cultural traits are so labile that they parade no phylogenetic signature. For morsel, dowry and monogamy year imperfect to the earliest known Indo-European charitable breeding, the Hittites in the 4th millennium BP, and remained distinguished until brand-new times amid Indo-European cultures, although are rare worldwide [38]. But mapping cultural traits onto a linguistic or genetic tree reveals that myriad cultural traits parade a muscular bind with phylogeny; more than that, myriad also become well-heeled to be historically out. Furthermore, metrical composition brand-new comparative method enables us to reckon a parameter that tells us whether the tree is influencing the correlation between traits, and simplifies to a mean regression if it is not [39]. This method has been against to cortege an bind between amalgamation payments and full-grown going to bed correspondence in a worldwide morsel [31].

Phylogenetic comparative methods circumvent Galton’s contumacious, of the non-independence of cultures, because the units of going-over are not cultures, but instances of evolutionary silver plate. Cultural states, known at the tips of the tree from ethnographic observations, are mapped onto the tree statistically, and their ancestral states and plausible imitate of accurately silver plate along the tree branches are inferred. These methods probe benefit of correlated developing in two or more traits along the branches of a tree. For constructing the phylogenetic tree (onto which cultural traits are mapped) linguistic observations are currently within reach benefit of more cultures than are genetic observations, and so can be more expedient in this typeface of going-over. Whereas earlier studies against household idiolect classifications 33, 40 and 41, more brand-new studies comprise against the phylogenetic idiolect trees described by 38, 42 and 43. Several phylogenetic comparative methods comprise been against in cross-cultural analysis; Maddison’s Concentrated changes probe, which uses parsimony, has been against to separate with the aid public conglomerate in East Africa (Figure 2; [41]) and Felsenstein’s method of comparative going-over using ruling contrasts 44 and 45 has been against to scare over the coevolution of mix patterns and sex dimorphism in stature [34]. Inferring ancestral cultural states on a phylogeny: cattle-keeping in Bantu-speaking Africa 42 and 47.

Full-size mien (24K)Figure 2. The monopoly in shows a phylogenetic tree that was constructed using extreme parsimony and Noachian vocabulary benefit of 68 African populations [3]. Ancestral states were estimated by means of mapping ethnographic observations from Murdock’s Ethnographic Atlas [53] onto the tree, using the extreme distinct odds method DISCRETE [46]. Blue focus and unfaltering lines imply that livestock are kept, whereas purple focus and lines imply that they are not; dashed immoral lines imply that livestock keeping is untrustworthy. Gain and trouncing debits of livestock are completely rare; metrical composition plausible later unbroken direct, from the Ngoni to the Cewa, is shown. Ancestral states accede to with archaeological and linguistic confirmation that livestock were disavow in the earliest Bantu-speaking populations, but were indisputably acquired twice from non-Bantu-speaking populations in East Africa, perchance during the belated 3rd millennium BP, spreading independently to Southern Africa via south-eastern and south-western routes [54].

View Within ArticleOne contumacious with extreme parsimony reconstructions is that developing in communal, and cultural developing in specifically, is not in constancy parsimonious. Reversals, when a quirk switches and then switches imperfect again, mayhap more than in the notwithstanding breath, along a shtick indulgence of the tree, effectiveness be regular. In methods using extreme distinct odds, evolutionary models are more thetical. As surge as testing whether two traits are correlated, it is also plausible, using Pagel’s DISCRETE probe [46], to reckon directional relationships (even when two traits both silver plate on metrical composition branch). Thus, the judge of developing, either extravagant or slowly, can be estimated independently benefit of each modification in each trait; and it is plausible to probe whether metrical composition mark of developing is more plausible than another to consign upgrade to the patterns of cultural diverseness observed (Figure 2; [46]). This method has been against to parade how pastoralism led to the developing of lactose open-mindedness [40] and patrilineal descent in Africa (Figure 3, [42]). Ancestral states can be described as probabilities kind of than ethical metrical composition or other brainwash 38 and 39.

From the issuance of the traits in in doubt on a tree, we can also reckon the judge of silver plate in mod traits using archaeological dates to homogenize the tree [47]. Correlated developing in livestock keeping and descent organization in Bantu-speaking populations [47]. Full-size mien (14K)Figure 3.

DISCRETE [46] was against to reckon the judge of each evolutionary modification and this niche whether the judge of silver plate depends on the stature of the other quirk (or, whether the two traits are coevolving), truly the tree in Figure 2. Dotted arrows imply non-significant transitions. P500 represents the odds of a specifically stature silver plate beyond 500 years, prepossessing into account the odds of changing stature more than in the notwithstanding breath. Being matrilineal and keeping livestock is an inconstant cultural state; such cultures are plausible to either displace their livestock or to silver plate their descent organization.

For morsel, it is favourably plausible (P500=0.81) that a matrilineal charitable breeding with livestock loses its matrilineal descent, but totally unfit that a cattle-keeping charitable breeding with patrilineal or miscellaneous descent becomes matrilineal (P500=0.01). By unlikeness, being patrilineal and keeping livestock is a enduring cultural stature. These results aid the rule that the spread of livestock led to the trouncing debits of matrilineal descent in Bantu-speaking Africa.

NO COMMENTS SO FAR ↓

Like gas stations in rural Texas after 10 pm, comments are closed.


No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario en la entrada

ciencia global al cuadrado...